
Why Working with a Group or Team Matters
by Prof. David A. Lane
Many organisations now operate in fast-changing, uncertain environments where decisions need to be made quickly and where no single person has all the answers. Because of this, teams are increasingly expected to think, learn and act together. Team coaching has grown in response to these pressures, especially as workplaces become more agile, distributed and dependent on collaboration across boundaries.
​
A key distinction often made is between group coaching and team coaching. A group is made up of people who may share a broad interest or learning need, but who do not necessarily depend on one another to complete their work. A team, by contrast, has shared goals, linked responsibilities and mutual accountability. Team members rely on one another to achieve outcomes that none of them could deliver alone. This distinction matters because the coach needs to choose an approach that fits the situation. A group may need support for learning and reflection, while a team may need help clarifying purpose, improving relationships, coordinating work and engaging with stakeholders.
However, a shared purpose is central to effective teamwork. In complex environments, traditional command-and-control leadership is often too slow or rigid. Teams need a clear sense of why they exist, whom they serve and what they are trying to achieve. A shared purpose gives direction, supports decision-making and helps team members stay committed when circumstances change. However, purpose does not simply appear by itself. It needs to be explored through dialogue, reflection and shared meaning-making. This is particularly important in. the context of entrepreneurial structures where rapid feedback between teams and their customers is a key part of the edge they have over larger organisations.
The coach can help the team create a story about who they are, why their work matters and how they want to work together. Formulating that story provides a sense of direction and generates commitment by crafting the shared concern that drives the business.
​
Narrative formulation is a practical way to make sense of team life. Formulation means gathering information, noticing patterns, forming working hypotheses and revising those hypotheses as new understanding emerges. In team coaching, formulation helps the coach and team identify what is happening, why it may be happening and what might need to change. It is not a fixed diagnosis. Instead, it is a flexible, shared understanding that evolves over time as the team learns more about itself and its context.
Several perspectives can support this process. Positionality encourages teams to consider where they stand in relation to what centrally matters to each of them as individuals and team members, their organisation, their stakeholders and wider society.
This includes paying attention to visible and less visible forms of diversity, such as culture, experience, role, education, identity, expertise and ways of thinking. Diversity can be a powerful source of creativity and insight, but it can also be overlooked or mishandled. Coaches can help teams notice whose knowledge is being heard, whose perspectives are marginalised and how different forms of difference affect performance and relationships.
A systemic perspective is especially important. Rather than seeing a team as just a collection of individuals, with a shared goal we can see them as living systems of interaction. What matters is not only what each person does, but also the patterns that develop between them and between the team and its wider environment. These patterns shape trust, communication, learning, conflict, coordination and performance. One way to look at a team is through the Attitudes, Behaviours and Cognitions framework. Attitudes include psychological safety, trust, cohesion and confidence. Behaviours include communication, coordination, conflict management, leadership and regulation. Cognitions include team learning, shared mental models, team climate and knowing who has which expertise.
​
These elements are connected. For example, psychological safety helps people speak openly, which supports learning. Trust can make it easier to handle disagreement without damaging relationships. Clear communication and coordination help people align their efforts. Team performance is therefore not simply an outcome measured at the end of a project. It is an ongoing process of preparing, acting, monitoring, adapting and reflecting. This is particularly important for modern teams that form quickly, change shape and work on several tasks at once.
There are several coaching models that can guide practice. Clutterbuck’s PERILL model highlights five areas that affect team effectiveness: purpose and motivation; external processes, systems and structures; relationships; internal processes, systems and structures; and learning. Peters and Carr’s model focuses on stages of development, including setting up the team, launching it, supporting individuals, providing ongoing team coaching and reviewing learning. Stout-Rostron’s model adds a strong focus on relationships, cultural awareness, diversity and systemic understanding. Hawkins’ model identifies five capacities of high value-creating teams: commissioning, clarifying, co-creating, connecting and core learning.
Although these models differ, they share several themes. They all emphasise the importance of purpose, relationships, learning and the wider system. They also suggest that team coaching is not only about improving individual behaviour. It is about helping the team understand how it works as a collective, how it relates to stakeholders and how it can keep learning as circumstances change. Formulation can be used within any of these models by helping the coach and team collect information, identify key narratives, test assumptions, design interventions and update their understanding over time.
Of particular value is the work on strategies for coaching teams for corporate innovations. The work of Ivan Yong and Sam Lee holds out real promise for a way to coach within rapidly developing environments. They have developed approaches which look at corporate venturing in the areas of strategic investment, partnerships, incubators and co-development initiatives. They provide a basis for looking at dynamic corporate startup collaboration to guide leaders and coaches through the transformational journey that emphasises innovation culture, symbiotic partnerships and coaching strategies to unlock innovative and advantage.
Team coaching as an important response to the realities of contemporary organisational life. Teams face uncertainty, complexity, shifting membership and pressure to deliver value quickly. Coaches can support them by helping them clarify purpose, understand their dynamics, include diverse perspectives, engage stakeholders and build habits of continuous learning. Narrative Formulation offers a practical thread running through this work. It helps turn scattered information, different viewpoints and emerging patterns into a shared understanding that guides action. In simple terms, formulation helps a team answer three practical questions: What is going on here? What matters most? What do we need to do next?
Readers interested in a more detailed exploration of formulation in coaching can refer to Formulation-in-Coaching by David A. Lane, Sarah Corrie and Louise C. Kovács, which expands on the concepts introduced here.
